You are required to design a 'questionnaire' to be filled on-location by visitors, based on the following objective while writing a report:

The correct option is (c) - 1 and 2 only.

Why this is correct

The objective of the questionnaire is to determine the feasibility of a "family-oriented vacation resort." Feasibility studies primarily focus on demand and affordability.
1. Size of family: This is essential because the resort is specifically "family-oriented." Knowing the average family size helps determine the type of accommodation (suites, interconnected rooms) and amenities required.
2. Budget: This is the most critical factor for feasibility. It helps the developer understand the price point (luxury, mid-range, or budget) at which the resort should operate to be profitable and attractive to the target audience.
Together, these two factors define the "Product" and the "Price," which are the pillars of a feasibility report.

Why the other options are incorrect

• Option (a) - 1 and 3: While the number of earners (3) might influence the budget, it is an indirect and intrusive demographic question. The total "Budget" (2) is a more direct and relevant metric for feasibility than how many people contribute to that budget.
• Option (b) - 1, 2 and 4: Food allergies and dietary restrictions (4) are operational details handled at the service stage. They do not determine the "feasibility" of building a resort in a specific location; they are micro-level preferences that can be managed by any kitchen once the resort is functional.
• Option (d) - 2 and 3: This excludes "Size of family" (1). Since the specific objective mentions a "family-oriented" resort, ignoring family size would make the questionnaire fundamentally flawed as it fails to address the core nature of the project.

Key Concept

Feasibility studies focus on core strategic variables (target segment and purchasing power) rather than secondary operational details or indirect demographic data.