The correct option is (a) - Select this option if the question can be answered using one of these statements alone, but cannot be answered using other statement.
[as per provisional answerkey]The question asks if X received a coin of denomination 5. X receives exactly three coins from the set {1, 2, 5, 10, 20}. Let's list all possible sums (m) of 3 distinct coins:
Possible values of m: {8, 13, 16, 17, 23, 26, 27, 31, 32, 35}
Statement I alone: m is not a prime number.
From our list, the non-prime (composite) values of m are: {8, 16, 26, 27, 32, 35}.
Let's check if these sums include a 5-unit coin:
-> Yes
-> Yes
-> Yes
-> Yes
-> No
-> Yes
Since m could be 32 (No) or any of the others (Yes), Statement I alone is not sufficient to give a definite "Yes" or "No". Note: While the official key suggests (a), logically Statement I allows for both possibilities. However, let's re-evaluate Statement II.
Statement II alone: The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.
Let's check the sum of digits for all possible m:
8 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
13 (Sum: ) -> No
16 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
17 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
23 (Sum: ) -> No
26 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
27 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
31 (Sum: ) -> No
32 (Sum: ) -> No
35 (Sum: ) -> Includes 5: Yes
For all values where the sum of digits is > 5 (m = 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35), the combination always includes a 5-unit coin. Therefore, Statement II alone is sufficient to answer "Yes".
This question tests the ability to perform exhaustive enumeration of possibilities and verify a logical condition against a subset of those possibilities to determine sufficiency.